Thursday, March 10, 2022

An Update

    Yesterday I released a post called Fenceball, an attempt to complain about MLB's new ban on bunts. However, it turns out that they are not banning the bunt. I had heard it from two different friends, and read a couple articles speculating about the possibility of doing it in the future. To the relief of my blood pressure, athletic career, and passion for the game, they did not. Like I said, that would kill baseball, and the new game would be radically different. Since everybody aims for the fences nowadays instead of the gaps, I called this new game fenceball. 
    However, MLB has announced a couple of changes that will be put into effect in 2022. First, the National League will use the DH. I am not a fan of this, but a ban on bunting would be far worse. Secondly, the long awaited ban on shifts has been enacted. This I can live with. Shifting has helped make baseball into the simplistic, one dimensional sport that it is today - just a contest to smack a ball over a wall some 350 feet away. When I thought I heard that MLB banned bunts, I was afraid that the strategic game of baseball was all but dead. Luckily, our National Pastime survives today. 
    These kinds of things got me thinking. I have decided to publish a mini-series recounting all major changes in baseball history since 1900 (I will eventually write about 19th century ball, but since the game was so different back then, it will occupy its own mini-series). Since my book will cover players from every era of the game, I think that such a series will help put the candidates in better context. 

6 comments:

  1. Nobody bunts except with the shift so I dunno how much that's better, but there it is.

    (The CBA was signed! Hallelujah!)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well, Damien does, so it's a relief to him. It's still an important part of the game. Personally, I don't know if the CBA is a good idea.

      https://www.mlb.com/news/mlb-mlbpa-agree-to-cba

      This article talks a little bit about an automatic strike zone. That would be at least as bad as a ban on bunts. What I don't know is, will they call the same pitches on Jose Altuve as they would Aaron Judge? The whole mess would make baseball a less human game. For example, if there's only a camera instead of an umpire, how uncomfortable would that be? Besides, there is always the possibility of a baseball player losing it after a robot's call and smashing it with his bat. Heck, he could probably afford it.

      They also talk about a new postseason format with 12 teams instead of ten. For a sport with 30 teams, having 12 make the playoffs seems like too many. The Wildcard was bad enough, and in a perfect world they would return to the pre-1969 style.

      Delete
    2. Yeah, the playoffs are getting too big.

      They're not going to call the same strike zone on Altuve and Judge. I'm sure there's a way to adjust for height.

      I would not be too surprised if a player smashes a robo ump. Remember Curt Schilling smashing a $15,000 camera?

      Delete
    3. Yeah, I remember hearing about that. That very incident (by a pitcher, nonetheless) convinces me that there would be problems with robotic umpires.

      Delete
    4. You excited about the Giants signing Rodon?

      Delete

Classic Baseball Era Committee Ballot