Albert Belle
Barry Bonds
Roger Clemens
Don Mattingly
Fred McGriff
Dale Murphy
Rafael Palmeiro
Curt Schilling
I've written about most of these players before, so this will be relatively straightforward. McGriff and Schilling are the Hall's two worst omissions, in my opinion, and I'd expect them to go in (although Schilling was left out for entirely different reasons and dropped off the ballot this year; see my posts on the 2022 Hall of Fame ballot). Obviously I'd leave out Bonds, Clemens, and Palmeiro, but the other three are a little tricky. Belle may or may not have corked his bat, but if all allegations are false I'd probably vote for him. I wrote posts about Murphy (https://thecooperstownadvocate.blogspot.com/2021/04/why-i-think-dale-murphy-should-be-in.html) and Mattingly (https://thecooperstownadvocate.blogspot.com/2020/11/why-i-think-don-mattingly-should-be-in.html), but I'm not sure whether they positively belong. If I had the choice, I'd probably vote for Schilling, McGriff, Murphy, and perhaps Belle. What about you?
I'd be fine with voting for all except except Palmeiro, Murphy, and Belle.
ReplyDeleteI don't particularly feel the need for them to be in the Hall of Fame, though. I feel very ambivalent about this ballot.
Why Bonds and Clemens if not Palmeiro?
DeleteIf I'm going to vote for a steroids user, he has to be GREAT.
Delete